Talking Points for DEP Hearings on Proposed Fracking Rules

UPDATED INFORMATION: PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD ENDS ON 3/14!

Written Comment Period Extended to March 14

 

The DEP’s Environmental Quality Board is accepting comments on a proposed set of fracking rules as part of its public comment period. Below is a list of talking points you can use if you wish to submit written comments, along with the link to the page of instructions on how to comment. You’ll also find a downloadable version of the talking points.

Find a sample comment letter on the Delaware Riverkeeper Network’s website.

And please sign Ron Slabe’s petition calling on the EQB to ban frack pits!

 

 

 Berks Gas Truth * Clean Water Action * Delaware Riverkeeper Network * Earthworks * Clean Air Council * Damascus Citizens for Sustainability, Inc. * Sierra Club, Pennsylvania Chapter

  Proposed changes to Pennsylvania’s oil and gas regulations Key concerns and talking points In mid-December, the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) issued proposed changes to the state’s oil and gas regulations, known as Chapter 78 of the Pennsylvania Code. Act 13, the oil and gas law passed in 2012, requires DEP to make these changes. They are also necessary because regulations for conventional drilling are outdated and inadequate given the large amount of land and water used and waste and pollution produced in shale gas development. Public participation is essential to making regulations stronger and more protective of air, water, and health! You have until Narch 14th to submit written comments. You can use the analysis and talking points below (which cover key parts of the regulations) to prepare your comments. If you commented at one of the public hearings, you can still submit written comments. The regulations and public comment information are on the DEP’s website.

 

1. Pre-drill water testing and the restoration and replacement of contaminated water supplies (Sections 78.51 and 78.52). We learned through DEP’s determination letters that natural gas drilling operations have impacted at least 161 water supplies statewide. The natural gas industry has fought to have water restored to only pre-contamination conditions—even if it is not safe to drink. In addition, DEP leaves it up to the driller to decide when, where, and how to conduct water quality tests before drilling starts. DEP should require:

  • Operators to restore contaminated drinking water to a quality that meets Safe Drinking Water Act standards, no matter what the quality of the water prior to drilling. If the quality of a water supply prior to drilling was above these standards, the operator must restore the water to that higher standard; otherwise, good water supplies will be degraded.
  • All drillers to use a consistent list of parameters for pre-drill water testing, which DEP must establish before the proposed regulatory changes are adopted. The parameters should be as comprehensive as possible, but at a minimum match what DEP uses when it conducts full contamination investigations and to ensure that complete baseline data is available.
  • All drillers make pre-drill data available to the public, while protecting individual homeowners’ privacy, through an online platform, which DEP must establish before the proposed regulatory changes are adopted.

2. Standards for frack pits and impoundments (Sections 78.56, 78.57, 78.58, and 78.59). Mounting violations and the potential for water and air pollution have already led some companies to transition away from pits and standardize the use of closed loop systems which utilize tanks to store wastewater. DEP should:

  • Prohibit operators from using open pits for storage of regulated substances, including wastewater, drill cuttings, and substances (like gels and cement) that return to the surface after fracking. Many spills, leaks, and other problems involving pits have occurred statewide that contaminate water, soil and air. Waste should be stored only in closed systems. January 6, 2014
  • Prohibit the onsite processing of shale drill cuttings, which often contain hazardous substances and radioactive materials and require thorough analysis and special handling.
  • Define “freshwater” that is used in oil & gas operations. Water leftover from fracking and contaminated fluids being recycled for fracking (such as from mining or sewage) is often mixed with clean water for additional operations. The lack of a clear definition allows operators to avoid regulations on the use and disposal of polluted substances.

3. Disposal of brine, drill cuttings, and residual waste (Sections 78.60, 78.61, 78.62, and 78.63, and 78.70) Operators currently escape the strict federal regulation of hazardous substances that other industries have to follow. Yet drilling and fracking generate large amounts of solid and liquid waste that can harm water supplies, air quality, land, health, and wildlife. Pennsylvania should apply U.S. Resource Recovery and Conservation Act standards to regulate all aspects of the storage, transport, and use of hazardous materials contained in pits, centralized impoundments, and tanks. In addition, DEP’s proposed Chapter 78 changes don’t address the risks posed by hazardous waste and do little to improve current regulations or ensure safe disposal. DEP should:

  • Prohibit the burial or land application of drill cuttings, which can contain polluting and radioactive substances. DEP proposes different conditions for disposal of drill cuttings from above and below the well casing, but neither makes the practice safe. Cuttings from deep underground may contain more pollutants, but chemical additives and contaminated fluids are also found in drill cuttings from shallower areas.
  • Prohibit the onsite burial of waste pits. Buried pits can leak and pollute groundwater over time, yet burial allows operators to walk away from any responsibility after completing operations.
  • Prohibit the use of brine for dust suppression, de-icing, and road stabilization. Stormwater runoff carries brine into nearby waterways and wetlands. Not allowing the use of brine from shale gas wells is a positive step, but brine from conventional wells can also push salinity loads far above any naturally occurring conditions.
  • Prohibit the land application of tophole water, pit water, fill, or dredged material. These substances can contain chemicals and sediments bound with pollutants that pose risks to water, air and soil.

4. Identification of orphaned and abandoned gas and oil wells (Section 78.52(a). This is an important change and should be supported. About 200,000 abandoned wells exist statewide. As drilling spreads and intensifies, so does the chance of accidents, blowouts, and pollution from the intersection of new wells with old ones. DEP should expand these changes and require operators to:

  • Identify existing wells before site and well construction and drilling (not just fracking), so that the location of a new well can be changed if needed. Identified wells should be mapped on a publicly available web platform.
  • Plug and seal abandoned and orphaned wells according to state safety standards prior to well site construction. The state lacks funding to address the large number of old wells, so drillers should be responsible for preventing pollution of adjacent water wells and air pollution from accidents when they occur.

[gview file=”http://www.gastruth.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Final-Talking-Points-1.6.pdf”]

7 thoughts on “Talking Points for DEP Hearings on Proposed Fracking Rules

  • February 7, 2014 at 9:06 pm
    Permalink

    It is not appropriate to allow the gas industry to “drill now / worry later” They should be required to pre and post test the water supply for every acre they drill and the surrounding acres as well. typically the wells leak and contaminate water supplies for miles around.
    This is totally unacceptable. If peoples homes are poisoned, who will be around to buy the gas? Are we rendering whole tracts of pristine USA uninhabitable forever? Will be be having mutated children due to radioactive contamination from the shale formations into the drinking water including (already proven) radium, uranium, polonium, etc??? What a disaster!
    I vote to ban the process of hydraulic fracturing, and restrict drilling to “conventional” drilling involving simple putting a hole in the ground.
    Sincerely,
    Leo Macdonald
    Scientist

    • February 8, 2014 at 1:55 am
      Permalink

      I couldn’t agree more, Leo! Berks Gas Truth also supports a ban on fracking. I work with lots of organizations across the state, region, and country to fight for a ban, but still work on legislative and regulatory issues with a number of those groups, as well. My reason for doing it is that our environment, people, and animals are being harmed right now, so we need to improve the rules (and see that they are enforced), but never with the idea that it will be enough. Pre-drilling testing should absolutely be required (and by the same people who will test after contamination is discovered — not the case now), as should capping of orphaned and abandoned wells, something else that is not required in the proposed rules. I hope you’ll submit a comment to the DEP before the March 14th deadline!
      Best,
      Karen Feridun
      Founder
      Berks Gas Truth

  • March 5, 2014 at 12:39 pm
    Permalink

    Safety First!! Profits last.

  • March 5, 2014 at 1:54 pm
    Permalink

    As water is the most essential and precious commodity for all life, the very idea that these actions can be taken without concern for the population, human and otherwise, is beyond comprehension. Where is the study? Where is the testing? Where are the environmental protections we rely upon to keep ourselves, our property and our family’s safe? I stand against such cavalier actions on the part of the state, mandated to protect us and the corporate entities that put private profit above public responsibility.

    Anne Winn
    Private Citizen
    Chester County,PA.

  • March 5, 2014 at 3:12 pm
    Permalink

    Karen,

    I have submitted my remarks. I hope that one day there is either a law passed banning fracking forever or the PA Supreme Court rules that the fracking industry is violating the Constitution of the Commonwealth of PA, and they should cease and desist with all deliberate speed from fracking, plug their wells and clean up the wellpads and restore their sites.

    Best regards,

    Paul Roden

  • March 5, 2014 at 3:17 pm
    Permalink

    I agree with Karen Feridun, Founder, Berks Gas Truth and with Leo Macdonald, scientist.
    The gas you extract by fracking is not worth the damage to our environment, you polute the earth itself by damaging the water and the soil, ruining habitats for wildlife, and you don’t even know the long term damage you are doing to our planet underground.

    We, the people who love our planet are against fracking in every form.

    Loretta Calise-Simmons
    Environmentalist

  • March 5, 2014 at 4:15 pm
    Permalink

    I agree that fracking should be banned. However, as it seems to be proceeding, we must make strict laws to regulate it.
    1-Testing of water before and after should be required and done by a third party.
    2-The quality of the water should be tested at regular proscribed intervals during the drilling. 3-If and when water contamination occurs, drilling must stop and the water supply must be returned to pre-drilling status.
    4-Water standards shall be established by the EPA before any more drilling permits be issued.
    5-All data to be published in local papers- this is a community issue and should be part of a public newsletter established by the EPa for that community involved.
    6-Open pits to be prohibited.
    7-Prohibit processing of hazardous substances wothout special handling. This will require that there is regular inspection of the sites to determine status of materials there. Then the exisiting laws prohibiting hazardous substances must come into effect.
    8-All water used in fracking should be bought from that community and be of a contained, limited supply. This water is not to be returned to the community for drinking use. this water shall be reused and purified by the fracking company as needed. They shall not have free unsupervised access to any water.
    9- Hazardous substances: Operators must follow the strict fedderal guidelines on hazardous substances. Loopholes in this should be closed by the legislature and published in the local comunity paper for all to understand and recognize.
    10- All abandoned sites will be fined heavily and operators subject to jail terms if sites do not not follow appropriate clean up according to new laws. All use of sites should ultimately be taxed by the local water communities.

Comments are closed.